•TPC•

Cyrano’s Journal Online and its semi-autonomous subsections (Thomas Paine’s Corner, The Greanville Journal, CJO Avenger, and VoxPop) would be delighted to periodically email you links to the most recent material and timeless classics available on our diverse and comprehensive site. If you would like to subscribe, type “CJO subscription” in the subject line and send your email to

By Steven Jonas

11/11/07

One of the principal lessons that Karl Rove learned from his master teacher Lee Atwater was that he who controls the agenda wins the debate and, in grander terms, the election. Rove has been positively brilliant with this tactic, from 2000 onwards. True Bush policies and programs have never been on the agenda, whether in that first election or any of the subsequent ones. Rove has been able to do this on both the grand and the lesser scales. And so we come to the debate over torture and Judge Mukasey, and the agenda for that debate. I have no way of knowing whether Rove is still active on a day-to-day basis with the Bush White House. My suspicion is that he is, for these tactics have Rove’s fingerprints all over them.

What have they been able to do? They have been able to confine the whole discussion in the Congress and the bulk of the media to just what is the definition one particular torture technique known as ‘waterboarding.” Is it or isn’t it torture is the total matter for debate. It happens that it has been used by torturers, most of who were only too happy to have potential victims know what they might face, since the time of that “Instrument of God’s Will” known as the Spanish Inquisition. (Although the Inquisition was originally designed to “inquire” as to whether a particular resident of Spain after the official Expulsion of the Jews by Ferdinand and Isabella in 1492 was a Jew or not, it came to be more broadly used against a wide variety of persons perceived by its Catholic masters as “enemies of the church.”) The technique has been used by a variety of repressive and oppressive regimes, not the least of which was the German Nazis, as a frank method of torture of chosen victims. There is no record of either the Inquisition or the Nazis ever claiming waterboarding or any of their other techniques of choice were not torture. As I said, they wanted to make sure everyone knew exactly what went on in their chambers of horror.

But not so the Georgites. For they have a little problem, the details of which we shall get to below. In general terms it has to do with International Law, the U.S. Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the Georgites’ constant lying about what they are and are not doing, which still persists. Because of this little problem, they have needed to control the agenda of the debate. And boy have they done this well. The agenda, as noted, has been all about whether or not waterboarding is torture. It has not been about whether the Bush Regime tortures certain of its captives/victims, whether they have tried to cover that up, whether have violated the Constitution and the law, both domestic and international. The debate has been just at the level the Regime wants it to be.

They have also featured a second agenda item, whether or not torture (which of course they ain’t doing) if not generally justified, might just be justified in the “ticking bomb” scenario. (That that scenario has never been shown to occur doesn’t seem to concern those who would use it in such a circumstance. However, the fact that if it were to, anyone caught with the proper knowledge wouldn’t give it up anyway because a) they would want the bomb to go off and b) they would know they were going to die in any case. These considerations are treated by all of the non-experts discussing the matter as irrelevant. After all, they know all they need to know about the use of torture and the ticking bomb from the plots of the TV series “24.”) Thus the debate, as controlled by the Georgites, comes down to: “it is torture; no it isn’t; yes, it is; no it isn’t; yes it is,” and so on and so forth. The it goes on to “it is justified in certain circumstances, well what circumstances, yes it is, no it isn’t,” and so on. These are the matters that are essentially at the center of Sen. Schumer’s defense of his vote for Judge Mukasey (The New York Times, Nov, 6, 2007), and even the discussion in the Nov. 6 The Progress Report, “Tortured Logic.”

But this is not what the agenda for this debate should be. The United States is a signatory of the Geneva Conventions, by treaty. Under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, they have become part of the Supreme Law of the Land. Waterboarding was specifically defined as torture at the Nuremberg Trials and previously in 1902 by the US military when it was putting down the post-“liberation” revolt in the Philippines. Without doing a poll, we know it is regarded as torture by virtually all, if not every one, of the signatories of the Geneva Conventions. We know the Georgites knew this, and knew that the fact presented difficulties for them, as they obviously contemplated incorporating torture into their protocols for treating captives in the so-called “War on Terrorism.” How do we know that? Because as White House Counsel none other than Alberto Gonzales described the Conventions as “quaint,” i.e., discardable.
There is just one little problem here. Nations that abide by the rule of law cannot and indeed don’t discard treaty obligations just before they think one provision or another of them is “quaint.” They either abrogate the treaty (which in this case would put U.S. citizen captives of foreign regimes at great risk, to say nothing of even further diminishing the international stature of the United States) or they re-negotiate it. Obviously the Georgites didn’t want to do either one, even though they really care nothing about either of the above considerations. However, a) they apparently didn’t want to take the P. R. hit around the world, and b) much more to the point for them, they wanted to keep exactly what they were planning to do secret.

The primary agenda item for the current debate should not be whether or not the Georgites and certain of their supporters think waterboarding is not torture, or even if it is, that it might be justified in certain circumstances (even if these circumstances have never been known to occur except on the aforementioned “24″). The primary agenda item should be: how can the BushCheney Regime be allowed to willfully violate international law and in this case specifically an element of the Constitution, in this case defined as the supreme law of the land. This is an impeachable offense.

Now, finally, Judge Mukasey knows all this. He has already sold his soul to the devil, but he is neither dumb nor uninformed. He knows waterboarding is torture. He knows the Bush Regime does it. He can’t express either bit of personal knowledge under oath and still become Attorney General. (If he were to, can you say: “I suddenly discovered my family and want to spend more time with them”?) He can tell Sen. Schumer, not under oath, that he will “uphold the law” when it comes to torture. But when in the future it comes to the question, “but Mr. Attorney General, you said that you would uphold the rule of law and we now know for sure that the Regime uses waterboarding, and you did nothing about it,” he will be able to say, “Oh, are you talking about that private conversation I had with Sen. Schumer? Was it about waterboarding? By golly, I was sure we were talking about waterbriding. What a misunderstanding. As I recall, the subject of waterboarding never came up, just that one of waterbriding. If it had, I would have just said to him what I said under oath, I can’t comment on something I know nothing about.” Oh that control of the agenda. Atwater, Rove, Bush, Cheney, etc. Just brilliant. But the technique must be really tough to learn, because the Democrats just never seem to be able to do it, and seem not even to know how to try.

================================================================

We at Cyrano’s and Thomas Paine’s Corner need your help! Our editors and writers work hard to provide you with the most original and diverse progressive content on the Internet. We are fiercely determined to provide enough people with a sound political education so that, in authentic democratic fashion, the will not only liberate their minds, but eventually cure the economic and moral disease afflicting our nation.

We derive no financial remuneration for our efforts to build a social order based on justice, democracy, compassion, and humanity. Isn’t that your desire as well? In fact, it costs us money to maintain our Internet presence.

If each of you donated a mere $5 a month—a trifling sum these days, the price of pack of smokes or a fancy beer—we would have enough money to cover our overhead, upgrade our server capacity, expand our audio offerings, and begin to provide you with compelling video content.

By helping us in this fashion you will be assisting the birth of a new type of American democracy, one which, genuinely rooted in the ideals we profess to honor, will finally measure up to its promise.

For you, for us, for everything that you think needs defending, make a donation that fits your budget today by clicking:
***************************************************************

Comments RSS