Aug 26 2007
We Can’t Get No Educashion: A Critique of US Public Schools
Cyrano’s Journal Online and its semi-autonomous subsections (Thomas Paine’s Corner, The Greanville Journal, CJO Avenger, and VoxPop) would be delighted to periodically email you links to the most recent material and timeless classics available on our diverse and comprehensive site. If you would like to subscribe, type “CJO subscription” in the subject line and send your email to
By Emily Spence
8/26/07
Part One: The Overview
For years liberals have pointed out the huge gap between funding for military ventures and US public education. Indeed, a motto floating around for a decade or more sums it up well: “It will be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber.”
While it’s a bit overstated, the saying gets the point across and no one can dispute that our federal government spends an inordinate sum for our armed forces, armaments and other military provisions while many needs back in the US get short shrift. Aside from New Orleans never being put back together right, there are the problems of the worn out US infrastructure, the low income housing deficit, the high rate of homelessness and the migration of jobs overseas such that one in seven is expected to disappear over the next ten years. At the same time, there exist many other serious problems needing an immediate infusion of cash and workers (for which returned US military troops could be employed) to provide national relief. Moreover, education is woefully under funded and could certainly use any help available for its improvement.
All of the above in mind, the cost of the War in Iraq, alone has been close to half a trillion dollars [1]. The overall military budget for 2008 is 51 % ($1,228 billion) of US governmental revenue whereas ALL other expenditures amount to 49 % ($1,159 billion). Meanwhile, Human Resources provisions (from which education receives a modest amount) are set at $748 billion while General Government spending is set at $295 billion from which interest on the government debt commandeers 20 % of funds and Homeland Security another 17 %. Furthermore, Physical Resources (out of which transportation related and environmental needs are funded) receives $116 billion from which another 17 % goes to the physical needs (such as buildings, etc.) for Homeland Security [2].
When the above funding decisions are assessed all together, it is no wonder that the US Department of Education received only $68,084,800 in 2007. It is also not surprising that President Bush wants this amount pared down to $60,220,138 for 2008 [3]. At the same time, this spending is being requested to be all together removed from the US Budget in order to try to help balance the huge debt load, almost nine trillion dollars (approximately $30,000 per US citizen), that our government has driven into place [4]. The totality certainly staggers the imagination [5].
Is it any revelation then that the quality of education varies vastly from community to community based on the relative wealth that each has? Likewise, is it incredulous that the breach is widening?
All considered, there is no equality in educational provision. For example, current per pupil annual cost in Greenwich, CT is $15,166. In 2004, the average amount spent annually per student in the US was $8,287, with the low at $5,008 (Utah) and the high at $12,930 (New York). In other words, the range is amazing and one can expect that ghetto schools in each state receive less than the average sum whereas more affluent communities get more than ample funding. With property tax valuations as the primary measure to assess the amount of money that school districts obtain, there is bound to be a wide range of highly significant disparities [6].
Furthermore, local school boards further compound this problem by having a large say over the curriculum used in schools. This too impacts the quality of education capable of being delivered.
For instance, we can have intelligent design theory taught along side of evolution, no trigonometry or foreign language classes offered, or no computers available (as they are too costly to provide when assessed along side other needs such as books on the history of the evangelical movement to the exclusion of one focused on the history of minority group contributions to society). Yet, how much more agreeable would education be as delivered in Canada wherein every teacher in every school uses the same materials (supplemented by ones of local choice) for its core curriculum and every student is on the same page with the same academic expectations regardless of whether they live in British Columbia or Montreal?!
All of these factors considered, education is poorly delivered in the US. This has been well documented by innumerable educational watchdogs, such as Jonathan Kozol and John Gatto, whose conclusions are both highly alarming and disgraceful.
For example, Jonathan Kozol has construed (after countless studies conducted at a large number of diverse schools) that our educational system creates extreme discrimination based on economic class. On account, those who are advantaged (to receive quality public education) are afforded an unfair advantage in terms of obtaining of money, power, privilege, class status, along with other tangible and intangible benefits [7].
As a result, many students throughout the United States have no chance of succeeding through no fault of their own. Under the circumstances, the loss to the individual and the society at large is staggering. For a nation that supposedly treasures equal opportunity, this is nothing short of intolerable.
In relation, John Gatto elucidates on the findings of a 1990’s ETS conducted national literacy survey:
“Ninety-six and a half percent of the American population is mediocre to illiterate where deciphering print is concerned. This is no commentary on their intelligence, but without ability to take in primary information from print and to interpret it they are at the mercy of commentators who tell them what things mean. A working definition of immaturity might include an excessive need for other people to interpret information for us.“Certainly it’s possible to argue that bad readers aren’t victims at all but perpetrators, cursed by inferior biology to possess only shadows of intellect. That’s what bell-curve theory, evolutionary theory, aristocratic social theory, eugenics theory, strong-state political theory, and some kinds of theology are about. All agree most of us are inferior, if not downright dangerous. The integrity of such theoretical outlooks— at least where reading was concerned—took a stiff shot on the chin from America. Here, democratic practice allowed a revolutionary generation to learn how to read. Those granted the opportunity took advantage of it brilliantly.” (To have access to more of this assessment, please go to the eighth “[8]” citation below.)
The ramifications of both Kozol’s and Gatto’s findings are multifold. For example, the general workforce derived from many HS and college graduates is ill prepared to do much beyond almost thoughtless, menial labor. The disparity between those who’ve been provided a sound education and those who have not will be huge in terms of mental and many other kinds of capabilities. The value of a HS or a college degree, in and of itself, will hold no meaning as the bottom line involves from where the degree originated. The income disparity between those who have sufficient funds and those who do not will increase. Even more awful than these other factors is that the next generation will be poorly prepared to lead America into the next century in any meaningful fashion.
An equally disturbing fact is that thinking is thus curtailed to the most rudimentary types for a large number of Americans. In short, many individuals simply are not able to understand whatever they are not trained to comprehend. In this sense, the lack of knowledge concerning science (i.e., the facts of evolution) and rudimentary mathematics (necessary to balance a check book), language usage (needed to communicate basic information on the job) and much more is predictable.
Indeed, obvious educational shortfalls in the US appear responsible for many people’s inability to grapple with the more complex ethical issues, diminished capacity for critical analysis (i.e., to undertake synthesis and extrapolation to generate clarifications and accurate models of “reality” as, for instance, are the ones posed by transitional frames of reference) limited hermeneutical understandings, incapacity to differentiate logical VS. illogical patterns, etc. Meanwhile TV shows are one of the most popular methods to gain information on the parts of many, it would seem, and simply aren’t set up to impart much of value beyond a fleeting entertainment factor and superficial news coverage of selective topics.
All told, John Gatto, Jonathan Kozol and other critics repeatedly and disparagingly point out that public education (in the US and elsewhere across the globe) is guaranteed to keep economic classes in their relative placement and trapped in a basic inability to apply higher level cognitive skill sets. Thus, many individuals absolutely have to rely on commentators (i.e., authority figures for the most part) to form their understandings of events. Alternately put, students in many school districts are not taught to think independently nor question the opinions provided by the status quo. How convenient for those in powerful leadership positions! How easy then it becomes to keep corrupt systems in operation as many people cannot even conceive of alternatives let alone figure out ways to put them in place!
The results, then, are clear. For example, one in five American adults do not know who the US VP is. Mainstream news commentators and governmental leaders seem credible even when spouting the most audacious lies, and so on [9]. Stanley Milgram carried out some interesting studies, which indicate that it is easy to influence people to conform to the attitudes and commands of those in power even when these involve injuring or killing another person.[10] How much easier such outcomes must be to achieve when people lack some essential mental skills to form autonomous conclusions. Lastly, it is hard for people to stand against the underlying norms (i.e., that you will be contented if you just buy this X product that you deserve to have and on which your self-esteem depends) as they cannot see through the propaganda.
All in all, it is easy to quell any discontent with “the way things are” when people cannot conceive of better alternatives nor question the currently prevalent standards and practices. Thus, the current inequities in schools and society at large will likely continue unchallenged and uncorrected.
At the same time, the current income disparity amongst classes is all but assured to continue such that most members of the lower and upper economic classes will keep in their relative positions, as will their children. After all, who can afford to pay ~ $140,000 dollars for an undergraduate education and ~ $180,000 for four years of graduate school except for the relatively wealthy? Who can even meet minimal standards for studies at a school of higher education after learning at one of the glaringly inferior schools?
Moreover, taking on this cost as a student loan is particularly ludicrous in many circumstances in that the Federal minimum wage (currently set at $5.85/ hour) all but assures that many jobs available to new graduates will not be able to be provide sufficient income for them to pay back borrowed money (which, nonetheless, keep accruing interest over time). All considered, is it any wonder that the default rate on student loans is over ten percent, while amounting to many millions of dollars? Is it not assured that myriad related problems for former students, who were unable to repay loans, will subsequently transpire — such as inability to take out a mortgage due to a bad credit rating or, even worse, bankruptcy [11]?
At the same time, the jobs available to the graduates are disappearing. One in seven US jobs will disappear over the next ten years on account of industrial globalization. The majority of the ones that will be left will be the types that are impossible to outsource — types like food service delivery at fast food chains, construction jobs, clerk positions at mega-malls, health care provision, teaching and the likes.
A further consideration concerns the sort of quality in educators that can be expected with the salaries that many teachers command. For instance, someone with a Ph D in education can expect a starting salary of $22,000 in some public school systems. Even if someone with a doctoral degree were to consider accepting such a low income, what sort of person would he be?
It would likely to be someone who is either highly dedicated to humanitarian service or, due to some sort of serious flaw, were unable to “make it” in the business world. After all, what other rationale could explain someone willingly taking such a pitiful salary? Who could consider supporting a family or even renting a home with such a ridiculous wage?
All in all, we are a land that supposedly supports “liberty and justice for all” (or so our Pledge of Allegiance that school children recite every day states). In practice, though, we have an educational caste system of the worst sort imaginable. It is just one more scandal (along with the treatment of the victims from Hurricane Katrina, our military invasion of Iraq without sufficient provocation and evidence of myriad other woes) plaguing our so-called great country.
[1] To see the total cost for the War in Iraq, please refer to information provided at: http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182.
[2] To review US budgetary figures, please see: The Federal Pie Chart (http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm).
[3] This data derives from: U.S. Department of Education Budget News
(www.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/news.html).
[4] An overview can be obtained at: Cutting the Federal Budget to Prevent U.S. Bankruptcy: Part …
(http://www.lewrockwell.com/grichar/grichar38.html).
[5] Debt figures and similar provisions are located at: U.S. National Debt Clock (http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/).
[6] This and related information is reviewed at: US Census Press Releases.
[7] A summation of Kozol’s findings can be found at: Still Separate, Still Unequal: America’s Educational Aparthe… (http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2005/American-Apartheid-Education1sep05.htm).
[8] Please refer to: The National Adult Literacy Survey - John Taylor Gatto (http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/3j.htm).
[9] At these sites, the ease with which this trickery can be executed is shown: Bill Moyers Journal . Buying the War . Watch the Show | PBS (www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html) and Bill Moyers’ “Buying the War” Exposes the Media’s Failure to… (www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/24/730/).
[10] To learn more, please go to: Stanley Milgram - The Stanley Milgram Website (www.stanleymilgram.com/references.html) and, for an extensive analysis, Obedience to Authority (1960-63) (www.humanresearch.msu.edu/training/Milgram_Paper_by_H).
[11] Please check information at these links to see definitions of business and personal bankruptcy, as well as number of cases in US for 2005: Bankruptcy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankruptcy) and http://www.uscourts.gov/bnkrpctystats/bankrupt_f2table_dec2006.xls.
A SPECIAL MESSAGE TO OUR READERS.
For over two years now, Thomas Paine’s Corner has been a powerful and unwavering voice for a courageous and badly needed agenda for change. We have consistently delivered hard-hitting and insightful commentary, polemics, and analysis in our persistent efforts to persuade, educate, and inspire, and serve as a discriminating but generous platform for voices from many points of view with one thing in common: their spiritual honesty and quality of thinking.
•
Aside from the caliber of its content, Thomas Paine’s Corner’s strength is that there are no advertisers or corporations to exercise de facto censorship or orchestrate our agenda. We aim to keep it that way and we need your help!
•
As a semi-autonomous section of the multi-faceted, thoroughly comprehensive, and highly prestigious Cyrano’s Journal Online, we share Cyrano’s passion for winning the battle of communications against systemic lies, an act which is essential to attaining social and environmental justice. To help us achieve that goal, Cyrano’s Journal, besides its regular editorial pages, intends to begin producing editorial videos to expose the lack of proper context, ahistoricalism, excessive over-emphasis on inane events, and outright lies the corporate media, and in particular television, present to you and your family as a steady diet of pernicious intellectual junk food. This will be an expensive under-taking and there will be no grants forthcoming from the likes of the American Enterprise Institute, the Coors or Heritage Foundation. You can be sure of that!
•
As Greek mythology has it, the powerful are frequently defeated by their own hubris, and that’s precisely what we are witnessing today. Our rotten-to-the-core, usurping plutocracy has become so overtly and arrogantly corrupt that our patience has now reached its generous limit, and the membrane of America’s collective consciousness is about to burst. This will result in a significant restructuring of our socioeconomic and political environments, we hope (and must make sure) for the better. Considering what is at stake in the world today, Cyrano’s Journal and Thomas Paine’s Corner want to accelerate the arrival of that new day, and its promise of a new, truly well organized, kind, and honest civilization.
•
Assisting us in our cause is as simple as clicking on the PayPal button below and exercising the power of your wallet. No matter how large or how small, we thank you in advance for your donation! If you are serious about our struggle for a new society, please don’t put it off. Let us hear from you today.
•Jason Miller
Associate Editor, Cyrano’s Journal Online, and Editorial Director, Thomas Paine’s Corner.
Patrice Greanville, Editor in Chief, Cyrano’s Journal Online
How painful it was to read that article! It wasn’t particularly painful because of the content. After all, the author’s three main points - inadequate govt. funding, inequalities in the curriculum, and unaffordable higher education - are well-worn rhetorical tracks. I suppose one could fault the author for essentially having nothing to contribute to the discussion about public education, but that isn’t what prompted me to respond. How ironic that this author chose to comment on the deterioration of public education, when she is clearly a walking advertisement for its sorry state? The writing in this article would be par for an ambitious, but struggling, High School Junior.
“The value of a HS or college degree, in and of itself, will hold no meaning as the bottom line involves from where the degree originated.”
“…i.e., to undertake the synthesis and extrapolation to generate clarifications and accurate models of ‘reality’ as, for instance, are the ones posed by transitional frames of reference.”
“…is it incredulous that the breach is widening?”
“Johathan Kozol has construed that our education system creates extreme discrimination based on economic class…”
And the real groaner…
“On account, those who are advantaged (to receive quality public education) are afforded unfair advantage in terms of obtaining of money, power, privilege, class status, along with other tangible and intangible benefits.”
Try to do some editing next time, Emily. And while you’re at it, try learning something about your subject. The answers to public education’s problems have nothing to do with
federal funding levels or the need for centralized curriculum. That is disinformation, and you are (naively, I’m sure) perpetuating it. You’re correct that our youth are being inadequately prepared to do work that is likely to be unavailable anyway, but how is more federal funding and a centrally-controlled curriculum going to solve those problems?
Jonathan Kozol and John Taylor Gatto are just as alarmed about the culture of education as they are the economic inequalities. They cite the hidden curriculum of unquestioning obedience to authority; the training to submit to arbitrary and even inane demands; the psychological effect of fragmenting the world into stand-alone “subjects” and skill sets composed of facts and procedures to be memorized and regurgitated; the harm in constantly short-circuiting interest and involvement with bells and buzzers; the fact that the child is increasingly abandoned to the tender mercies of the state, as economic forces destroy families and communities; the damage done by grading, rewards, and other means of impersonal extrinsic control, etc. Increasing the federal government’s role in education, through funding and curricular control, is only going to make these problems worse.
I believe that we should accept the fact that the public educational system is working exactly the way it was intended to work. It was created to produce people who will be subservient to the capitalist system. The so called upper class have there own private schools, which teach them to manage and extend the exploitation of the masses. The rest of us who can’t afford the tuition, are taught to revere those in charge and work hard so we can one day achieve a better quality of life.
For those who are on top, everything is running exceptionally well. We have a booming prison complex to take care of those who don’t submit to the power structure. For the so called middle class, they work harder and longer for less money to avoid being caught up in the justice system. It is a travesty that children aren’t given a comprehensive course on managing credit. That alone would change the actions of many kids, who out of ignorance get caught in the many nooses laid out for them when they graduate. Of course this isn’t a priority because the system needs people steeped in debt to continue.
Anyone who sends their children to any school expecting them to be taught all of what is needed to become a well rounded individual with the ability to “think” for themselves and earn a good living, they will be disappointed. Parents need to take responsibility for their children. They need to be involved in every aspect the educational process, understanding that the system as a whole is ineffective.
At the end of the day it is the responsibility of parents to raise children to be upstanding adults. A child can go to the best school there is, but if the parent doesn’t reinforce and challenge their own child to excel, it really doesn’t matter.