Jul 16 2007

Sicko 2: Moore vs. Gupta

Cyrano’s Journal Online, Thomas Paine’s Corner, The Greanville Journal, CJO Avenger, and VoxPop are initiating a weekly email which will include links to both the most recent offerings and to timeless classics available on our very diverse and comprehensive site. If you would like to subscribe, type “CJO subscription” in the subject line and send your email to

cnn

by Andrew S. Taylor

7/16/07

Michael Moore recently went head-to-head with Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent, over a short, pseudo-journalistic hit-piece crafted by the latter in which Moore is charged with “fudging the facts” in Sicko, his new film about the woeful inadequacy of American health care. Their heated debate on Larry King Live provided little illumination, as both quibbled over figures and source citations. Moore did his best, over the course of five minutes, to refute what amounted to a cheap, underhanded assault on his journalistic credibility, but viewers could easily have come away from the exchange with little appreciation for just how sleazy and manipulative Dr. Gupta’s attack on Moore actually was.

What we never got to see was the much-needed debunking of Gupta’s piece, which was essentially a series of astonishing non sequiturs unified only by an emotional arc of patronizing cautionary tones. Judging from the strategy taken in this piece - very much in line with what I’ve seen elsewhere this past week in The New York Times and other publications known for their elitist air of dignified skepticism - the corporate media’s spin-strategy regarding Sicko is going to be to 1) admit that the most damning facts are true, and 2) convince the public that the price of correcting them is more than we as Americans would want to pay.

Let’s observe how Gupta’s short piece, which can be seen here along with the subsequent “debate”, accomplishes this. The film begins with a straight-up admission that the U.S. does indeed rank a low #37 in the World Health Organization’s world-wide survey for quality of health care. He then continues to show France as #1, Italy at #2, Spain at #7, and the U.K. at #18. But then he “reveals” that Cuba rates a #39, two points below the U.S., as if this fact was somehow concealed in Moore’s film (it was, in fact, quite visible on screen). Moore never concealed this fact, nor did he claim that the United States should emulate Cuba except in one noteworthy respect - of “reaching out to our enemies.” But right off the bat, we can see that Dr. Gupta is setting up Moore as someone whose sympathies have blinded his capacity for objectivity.

The debate over dollar expenditures on health care in Cuba and the U.S., in which Dr. Gupta calls Moore to task for being “slightly off” in his numbers, is a remarkably disingenuous tactic. Dr. Gupta, a journalist as well as a doctor, must be fully aware of the fact that side-by-side comparisons of per capita expenditures in dollar amounts between vastly different economies are inadequate measures of the actual cost of health care relative to the country in question. In Cuba, one dollar is many magnitudes more valuable to the individual citizen than it is in the United States. I suspect that Moore only brought up the $251 figure (initially quoted erroneously as $25 in Dr. Gupta’s piece - probably the work of an inexperienced CNN intern) for Cuba’s per capita spending in his film only to illustrate how disparate the two economies are. The point remains completely unchanged if the amount for Cuba is “actually” $229 as Dr. Gupta claimed. The only purpose in bringing these figures up is to attack Moore’s credibility - this, even though there is absolutely no substantive difference relative to the argument at hand. At any rate, Moore’s charge that Dr. Gupta is using “old data” turns out to be entirely correct - the figures of $6096 per year and $229 per year for the U.S. and Cuba respectively are clearly from the WHO website, which gives 2005 as the date. However, Dr. Gupta’s charge is also correct - Moore uses different sources for the U.S. and Cuba figures, and Moore’s figures for Cuba are even older, dating from 2003, while his figure for the U.S. is a recent projection of expenditures in 2007. It is possible that Moore considered the 2003 data on Cuba to be “more recent”, since it was actually used in the UN’s Human Development Report 2006. Moore also explains on his website that “if the Cuban government gave a figure on 2007 projected health spending, we’d have used it” (It is worth pointing out that, in fact, the two Cuba figures appear to show Cuba’s health-care expenses trending downwards - either that, or Cuba’s economy lost some ground relative to the world economy between 2003 and 2005). But what’s truly revealing about Dr. Gupta’s “correction” of Moore’s figures on Cuba is that they are obviously no more accurate than Moore’s, and his attempt to use them as an example of “fudging” on Moore’s part is nothing short of low-down character assassination.

The only thing more remarkable about the $229 figure is that, being $22 lower, it makes the U.S.’s performance that much more embarrassing. Moore’s recent data on the U.S. demonstrates what has been asserted by policy analysts for some time now; namely, that the cost of health care in the U..S. is growing rapidly ahead of inflation and personal income. Meanwhile, Cuba - a country of comparative poverty and a hobbled industrial base, is able to more or less match the U.S. health-wise. This fact alone should be scandalous - so Gupta’s only option in spinning it is to ignore it completely, and distract the viewers (and Moore) with insubstantial quibbles. (In case I hadn’t made it clear, this is like weighing an elephant and a hamster, and arguing about whether their weights have been offset by the presence of a flea or two).

But Dr. Gupta’s piece only goes from bad to worse on the subject of patient wait- times. Dr. Gupta mentions “non-emergency elective surgery,” in which “a study” reveals that Americans have the next-to-least wait time after Germany. He gives no comparative figures (i.e. what is the difference between best and worst - a wide spread or a marginal one?) and also fails to explain why Germany’s universal coverage bests the U.S. “That’s not something you’ll see in Sicko,” Dr. Gupta admonishes, referring America’s alleged wait-time superiority, “as Americans talk about their lack of coverage, and suffocating red tape.” This is truly a dirty tactic. The phrase “non-emergency elective surgery” goes by in a rush, and, juxtaposed as it is against the phrase “That’s not something you’ll see…” it implies again that Moore has left a crucial flaw in the universal health care systems of other countries out of the picture altogether.

But who did this study, and which countries were involved? The study was done by Commonwealth Fund in 2005, and only six countries were involved. This is exactly the same study Dr. Gupta references a few moments later on, only he doesn’t mention until that point that only six countries were involved. In fact, he leaves the viewer with the impression that he’s referencing the study for the first time at that later moment - most likely because he wants to imply that the U.S. is second best in the world on non-emergency elective wait-times, not just second best out of the six countries surveyed (here, incidentally, are the six countries involved in the study: United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and Germany).

There are some other interesting facts mentioned in the study, which can be found here, that somehow didn’t make it into Dr. Gupta’s noble fact-finding mission (all text in italics that follows is directly copied from the study):

It singles out the United States for having problems significantly in excess of any of the other five countries.

-”While sicker patients in all countries reported safety risks, poor care coordination, and inadequate chronic care treatment, with no country deemed best or worst overall, the United States stood out for high error rates, inefficient coordination of care, and high out-of-pocket costs resulting in forgone care.”

Patients in the United States report the highest number of medical errors.

One-third (34%) of U.S. respondents reported at least one of four types of errors: they believed they experienced a medical mistake in treatment or care, were given the wrong medication or dose, were given incorrect test results, or experienced delays in receiving abnormal test results. Three of 10 (30%) Canadian respondents reported at least one of these errors, as did one-fifth or more of patients in Australia (27%), New Zealand (25%), Germany (23%), and the U.K. (22%).

Patients in the United States spend the most, and get the least access for their money.

As was found in past surveys, the U.S. is an outlier in terms of financial burdens placed on patients. One–half of adults with health problems in the U.S. said they did not see a doctor when sick, did not get recommended treatment, or did not fill a prescription because of cost. Despite these high rates of forgone care, one-third of U.S. patients spent more than $1,000 out-of-pocket in the past year. In contrast, just 13 percent of U.K. adults reported not getting needed care because of costs, and two-thirds had no out-of-pocket costs.

But here comes the ultimate humdinger; a trick of editing that is downright diabolical. Dr. Gupta intones: “But in Canada, you can be waiting for a long time. A survey of six industrialized nations found that only Canada was worse than the U.S. when it came to waiting for a doctors appointment for a medical problem.”

Let’s hit the pause button..the big, evil edit is only seconds away. What has Dr. Gupta just said? Let’s paraphrase (and remember also that Dr. Gupta has only just now explained that the study only covered six countries, and creates the false impression that this moment is the first time in his report in which the study is cited). Out of 6 industrialized countries, the U.S. ranks number five for waiting periods, and Canada ranks 6th. In other words, the other four countries (Dr. Gupta, incidentally, never tells us who those four contries are, lest we learn that it’s those crazy socialists somehow besting us again) have less of a waiting time than the U.S.

A perusal of the PDF file available for download at the link above - remember, this is the same study Dr. Gupta used - reveals the following:

-Roughly one-half of patients in the top four countries featured in the study are able to get same-day appointments when sick, compared to only 30% of U..S. patients and 23% of Canadian patients. In other words, the degree by which the U.S. bests Canada in this figure is much smaller than the degree by which it falls behind any of the other four.

-U.S. patients had the highest rate of difficulty in getting care on holidays and weekends without going to an emergency room. Not surprisingly, the U.S. also had the highest rate of emergency-room use for conditions that could have been treated by a regular doctor.

-While the U.S. and Germany were the only two countries in which more than half of all patients could see a specialist within one month, Australia was a close 3rd at 48%. In four of the six countries, 80% or more of all patients were able to see a specialist within 4 months.

-The U.S has the largest percentage of people (16%) without a regular doctor. The next-highest percentage was only 8%, shared by Canada and Australia.

-The U.S. had the highest number of “coordination problems” with doctors - including duplicate tests and test data unavailable at the time it was needed.

None of this makes in into Dr. Gupta’s fair and balanced “fact-check”, of course - only the victory-dance about being number two to Germany, and the out-of-context comparison to Canadian wait-times (which, while it may speak ill of Canada’s system, clearly does not refute the success of socialized medicine in general).

Now cut to the whopper - testimony from pro-Bush minion Dr. Paul Keckley to the following effect. This is truly mind-blowing:

“That’s the reality of those systems. There are quotas, there are planned wait times, the concept is that care is free in France and Canada and Cuba, and it’s not. Those citizens pay for health services out of taxes, and as a proportion of their household income, it’s a significant number.”

Let’s review and reflect. Even though Dr. Gupta is fully aware - because he read the report - that the U.S. lags behind the other five countries in this study in just about every conceivable aspect of patient access, and even though he came right out and said himself that the U.S. is behind these other four countries which have universal coverage (though, importantly, he doesn’t say just how far behind), he still puts up this stink pile of a quote from a Bush-ite corporate lackey, for his “expert” testimony that patients in these other countries suffer under the unpleasant burdens of quotas and planned wait times. Dr. Gupta has performed the ultimate spin trick - one that is used in the mainstream media every day, so we should know how to spot it - of telling a little piece of the truth and then deliberately negating it from the viewers’ memory by following it with a contradictory statement that appears to not contradict it. It’s a kind of sequential elision. This trick been studied by psychologists and practiced by propagandists for decades, and it exploits a well-known weakness in human short-term memory. Observe this sequence:

Canada has a longer wait-time than the U.S…Canada has socialized medicine…socialized medicine involves quotas and wait-periods….obvious implication: socialized medicine will increase your wait-time. The fact that four other countries with socialized medicine bested the U.S. - which Dr. Gupta deliberately refrains from stating to make this tactic more effective (the viewer must infer it on the spot from the statement “only Canada was worse than the U.S.”) is now completely erased from the narrative.

And now onto the dreaded high taxes.

Immediately following Dr. Keckley’s testimony, we resume with Dr. Gupta’s narration:

“It’s true that the French pay higher taxes, and so does nearly every country ahead of the U.S. on that list. But even higher taxes don’t give all the coverage everyone wants.”

And return to Keckley:

“15 to 20% of the population will purchase services outside of the system of care run by the government.”

Here is where the rising arc of bullshit reaches its third-act denouement. You can’t begin a report with this magnitude of obfuscation, you have to build up to it, by winning the viewer’s trust and hypnotizing him with statistical half-truths. TV journalists know very well that the human brain, when presented with a mixture of information and image, will naturally default to the image for the narrative string, rather than the information. They will follow an easy linear progression as opposed to a non-linear inference. And these journalists also know that there is no better way to lie than by telling a half-truth.

Yes, they pay higher taxes overall, but they spend less money on health care, which means that there the cost to the individual of staying healthy is less, not more, regardless of whether or not they are paying higher taxes for free university education, cleaner air and so on.

The frightening beauty of the half-truth, the reason it is such an effective tool for propagating falsehoods, is that it allows the viewer to make - on their own, thereby implicating them in the thought-process and creating the much-needed illusion that they have come to their own conclusion - an incorrect inference based on an established truth. The viewer is shown something he knows to be true (those countries pay higher taxes), and then reaches “his own” unsubstantiated judgment (I will have less money if the United States adopts a system of universal, free health care). What better subterfuge for the conveyance of falsehood is there?

And, finally, we have these words of wisdom from Dr. Gupta.

“So, there’s no perfect system anywhere. But no matter how much Moore fudged facts - and he did fudge some facts - there’s one everyone agree on: the system here should be far better.”

So, Dr. Gupta tells us he is on our side after all. He sympathizes. Only he wants us to give up on the only solution to our problem that has been demonstrably effective. Bereft of any other expert suggestions, the viewer is once again implicitly re-directed (as always) to some mythical “third way” of health-care which never seems to arrive.

“And he did fudge some facts….” Indeed.

(I must correct a statement made in my previous essay on Sicko, in which I claimed that Moore “appears to be wrong” that Cubans live longer, on average, than Americans. The WHO data which I used gave Americans an average life-span of about six months longer than Cubans, as of 2005. Moore’s website, however, references data which puts Cubans ever-so-slightly ahead of American - 77.6 vs. 77.5 years respectively. What this tells me is that, in the aggregate, the U.S. and Cuba are in a statistical dead head for longevity, with minor variations each year in which one country moves just slightly ahead of the other. For all intents and purposes, they can be considered equals.)

Andrew S. Taylor is a Senior Contributing Editor to Cyrano’s Journal Online. He also serves as Associate Editor of Menda City Review, an online journal of literature and political commentary. His own short stories, which veer towards the experimental wing of the speculative fiction/slipstream fantasy genre, have appeared online and in print in various publications. He has also contributed numerous articles and reviews to American Book Review and Ghetto Blaster Magazine. He holds an M.A. from the Creative Writing Program at The City College of New York, and currently resides in Brooklyn.

donttrust

A SPECIAL MESSAGE TO OUR READERS.

For over two years now, Thomas Paine’s Corner has been a powerful and unwavering voice for a courageous and badly needed agenda for change. We have consistently delivered hard-hitting and insightful commentary, polemics, and analysis in our persistent efforts to persuade, educate, and inspire, and serve as a discriminating but generous platform for voices from many points of view with one thing in common: their spiritual honesty and quality of thinking.

Aside from the caliber of its content, Thomas Paine’s Corner’s strength is that there are no advertisers or corporations to exercise de facto censorship or orchestrate our agenda. We aim to keep it that way and we need your help!

As a semi-autonomous section of the multi-faceted, thoroughly comprehensive, and highly prestigious Cyrano’s Journal Online, we share Cyrano’s passion for winning the battle of communications against systemic lies, an act which is essential to attaining social and environmental justice. To help us achieve that goal, Cyrano’s Journal, besides its regular editorial pages, intends to begin producing editorial videos to expose the lack of proper context, ahistoricalism, excessive over-emphasis on inane events, and outright lies the corporate media, and in particular television, present to you and your family as a steady diet of pernicious intellectual junk food. This will be an expensive under-taking and there will be no grants forthcoming from the likes of the American Enterprise Institute, the Coors or Heritage Foundation. You can be sure of that!

As Greek mythology has it, the powerful are frequently defeated by their own hubris, and that’s precisely what we are witnessing today. Our rotten-to-the-core, usurping plutocracy has become so overtly and arrogantly corrupt that our patience has now reached its generous limit, and the membrane of America’s collective consciousness is about to burst. This will result in a significant restructuring of our socioeconomic and political environments, we hope (and must make sure) for the better. Considering what is at stake in the world today, Cyrano’s Journal and Thomas Paine’s Corner want to accelerate the arrival of that new day, and its promise of a new, truly well organized, kind, and honest civilization.

Assisting us in our cause is as simple as clicking on the PayPal button below and exercising the power of your wallet. No matter how large or how small, we thank you in advance for your donation! If you are serious about our struggle for a new society, please don’t put it off. Let us hear from you today.

Jason Miller
Associate Editor, Cyrano’s Journal Online, and Editorial Director, Thomas Paine’s Corner.
Patrice Greanville, Editor in Chief, Cyrano’s Journal Online

11 Responses to “Sicko 2: Moore vs. Gupta”

  1. Paul D.on 16 Jul 2007 at 5:37 pm

    May this article be plastered all over the internet!

  2. PEACE TO SAVE THE WORLD FROM EXTINCTIONon 17 Jul 2007 at 3:48 am

    “Doctor” Gupta remains an evil human being, assuming he is one to begin with.

  3. Sylvain Lamoureuxon 17 Jul 2007 at 2:50 pm

    WOW

    What a brilliant piece, I hope that someone emails this to Moore. In fact I will.

    You pointed out everything that my mind could see yet could not write. Thank you for this article and once again;

    WOW

  4. Reason > Politicson 19 Jul 2007 at 4:30 am

    Thank you for great illumination of CNN’s hit piece.

    Gee, Michael wasn’t perfect in his rebuttal, he unfortunately didn’t point out exactly why their hit piece was a propaganda device as clearly as he could; but you have done for us very nicely with this essay.

    And that was the biggest point of all; I even had a ‘loyalist” ( to traitor shrub ) type friend from work come to me and point out how MM “fudged the facts” word for word. I just laughed at him. Of course, he, like most that will scream murder at MM, never even saw the films (s).

    I found the CNN hit piece childish in its crude attempt to confuse the viewers, but then again, most people wont even see SiCKO, so they are ripe to buy whatever spin is put out.

    And that is a larger truth and problem; the US populace doesn’t want to now the truth about the scandal that is US health care. They don’t want to know the truth about Iraq, 911, tyrannical tactics by Cheney, etc.

    If they are enlightened to the truth, they will have to be responsible for making change, and sorry, but that would interrupt their free time. Easier to believe blatant lies in sound bites, and keep watching Paris on TV, and pretend it’s ok.

    We get what we deserve.

    =/

  5. erichon 20 Jul 2007 at 10:38 pm

    Thank you so much ANDREW S. TAYLOR. We need more people like you. Wake up America ! Look at your children, are they not priceless , they are US going forward..lets build a better America “TOGETHER”.

  6. garrywalshon 21 Jul 2007 at 6:45 am

    I live in Canada and health care in my country is just fine thankyou That said we have the same cast of evil elites that you do and the war to bring back the feudal system wages on up here as well. What saves us is our parliamentary democracy (desent is not silenced as in the tweedle dee/tweedle dum single party system in the USA) + our lack of influential evil religious leaders and no cracker South to be manipulated with prejudice based wedge issues.

    Health care in the USA is disgusting. The fact that there is any debate is astonishing to the rest of the western world.

  7. Ericon 23 Jul 2007 at 12:25 pm

    Hello,

    I’m French and proudly so
    Our system is perfectible but it works really well and we’re very happy to have socialized (we prefer saying mutualized) health care ; we take it for granted and everybody is happy with it
    I’d be scared to death to have to cope with american health care

    Best regards

  8. alexon 04 Aug 2007 at 10:23 am

    CNN is your people’s best friend. They drink from the same Kool-Aid you people do. All you people do is attack, and have nothing straight about the facts. Hey Eric, your french care was so great when 13,000 people died of mere dehydration in the summer of 2003. Were you one of the people who wouldn’t answer the phones when people were calling in. For all you people that think the main-scum media is for the right because they are owned by corporations, you people are morons. Go back to your move on, daily kos, or code stink web-sites. You people need to learn not to react on your girlie emotions, and react to actual facts sometimes. Have any of you heard about alternative medicine, or actually taking better care of yourself by exercising. I’d rather use illegal drugs on the street than use any of these prescription drugs out there today.

  9. Xcenturionon 04 Aug 2007 at 11:11 am

    ALEX: How about a brain transplant? Your fractured consciousness is pathetic, typical of wealth worshippers. Go on you piece of shit insulting other people and “standing tall” like some of your fantasy movie heroes. Engaging with you in a point by point analysis of anything is a waste of time. YOU UNDERSTAND NOTHING, ESPECIALLY THE EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTIONS UNDER “FREE ENTERPRISE.”

  10. manfredYccon 04 Aug 2007 at 11:49 am

    So Alex the solution in medicine is a return to a “do-it-yourself” medicine, with alternative meds as the mainstay? I think alternative med has its place but there are countles cases when conventional medicine is the answer, and we’re not debateing in this site so much about different approaches to medicine but about ACCESS to mass medicine and drugs by the masses. You confuse the pot enormously by saying things that, yes, have some basis in reality (like many drugs being pushed today on direct-to-consumer ads are bogus–have you seen this moronic drug for “restless leg syndrome”–oh my is that a dreadful disease…!), so that proves that american drug companies in particular are out to make a dollar first and foremost and that they have been bloodsuckers since time began…but that does not deny that there are some drugs that have and do a terrific job, many of them, I should add, discovered in government/university paid research labs and later turned over to these private big pharma companies to enrich their stockholders who have no trouble in ripping us off…

    Now,. having said that, it would seem, because your arguments are a bit murky, that you are saying that the left is wrong because it accuses the media of being a shill for the system, again you SEEM to be arguing that not all private corporations delivber the same kind of product? Well show me one, big boy. I’m 67 y/o and have never seen a privately owned medium of communications not tacking toward profits, and trimming its coverage (such as it is) to please corporate owners and advertisers.

    In sum, your arguments are not only murky but ridiculous. My only problem is that so many people in this nation think just like you, and drag those who think clearly down to the cesspool you have created thanks to your sheer stupidity.

  11. 7volniakson 04 Aug 2007 at 11:58 am

    Man wouldn’t it be great for the drug companies and the folks who own and run this country as a private corporation if we all docilely followed the siren call of a misguided (I’m assuming here, libertarianish) soul like “alex” who’s arguing for a return to a “do-it-yourself” medicalization? This guy’s argument essentially gets them off the hook! Alex, BigPharma will send you a big wet kiss oif appreciation for your work on their behalf.

    Stop trying to delude others with your mumbo jumbo.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply