Blood Lust and marketing

orlock_reads.jpgI’ve just returned from a weekend conference in Belgrade, hosted by the Radical Party of Serbia. I will write more about this soon, but some very interesting commentary took place, a lot of it focused on the corrupt ICTY — and the continued imprisonment of Dr. Vojislav Seselj. Four years and counting and no trial on the horizon.
Among the participants in the roundtable were Chris Black, Jacques Verges, General Leonid Grigorijevic Ivasov, Mick Collins, and Neil Clark. A judge from the Indian supreme court and two members of the Duma. So, all in all it was a varied and impressive group. I was happy to take part and speak. What struck me, in relation to the above mentioned postings, was the sense everyone had of the pernicious influence of mass media. The endless propaganda that is marketed via news organizations, corporate print media, and Hollywood film. The virtual commodities. Putting aside the deconstructing of film for a moment, I think it wise to examine the extent of the distortions and the magnitude of the machinery. The mechanisms of propaganda…by which I mean the framing and the nuances of message, are truly breathtaking. The ICTY, which is so nakedly illegal and so much the product of US and NATO design, is a great example. Much has been written on this, but it bears remembering. Same for the court in Rwanda, the ICTR. The intention is political and not legal. But the point here is that the coverage of such institutions is really amazing. The bias and slanting of information would make the Nazi propaganda machine proud. Marketing is everywhere. What I wonder is the engine for all this. We all know, or should, the Imperial designs. Beyond that, however, lurks something more disturbing. I have no name for it….but its a kind of primal blood lust.
Countries in the developing world are subjected to military aggression, social aggression, and economic aggression. But even if one gives them everything, they will come back for more. They will return for your soul. General Ivasov called them fascists, and Chris Black used the same term, only with gangster as a prefix. I began to think about the psychic deformities of such people. The individuals at the heart of this war machine. I have yet to arrive at conclusions, except that we are facing an enemy of true barbarism.
This leads me to ponder the commodification of all culture these dark days. Is there something inherently ideological about electronic media, for example? I don’t know. Godard said a close up of a face on a forty foot screen was automatically authoritarian. I suspect that is right. Behind this I try to grapple with Taylor’s and Zimmerman’s observations. How does it all tie together?
I leave it there for now. Jet lag is taking over. Its good to be back however.John Steppling

About this entry